Washington Post’s political revolution

This.

March 4, 2016

2016-02-26T033935Z_01_BKS40_RTRIDSP_3_USA-ELECTION-SANDERS-236

Washington Post

‘Americans are neither irrational nor apathetic. They’re alienated, because all the branches of the U.S. government have insulated themselves from the public to a dangerous degree. Rather than treating voters like barbarians at the gate, the government should let them in and allow them a more direct and meaningful role. Now that would be a revolution worth watching.’

[…]

Voters say they want a revolution. But that’s going to take more than electing personalities that channel our angry politics. If we want real change, we need to look at fundamental reforms to all three branches of our government.

Executive branch

First, we need to join most of the rest of the world’s democracies in moving to direct, majority-based elections of our presidents. In a late-January Washington Post-ABC News poll, 69 percent of respondents said they were “very anxious” or “somewhat anxious” about the idea of a President Donald Trump, and 51 percent said the same about a President Hillary Clinton. Yet outside a handful of swing states, most voters don’t see themselves as having much influence on the outcome of the November election. And they’re right: It’s basically impossible for Democrats to lose deep-blue states such as California or for Republicans to lose deep-red ones such as Idaho… 

Full article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/voters-want-a-revolution-heres-what-that-would-take/2016/03/04/ed0467e0-df22-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?tid=sm_tw

Clean Web Design